Blog

Should You Use Negative Social Proof In Fund Marketing?

Published: 23 February, 2020

Negative social proof is often used by marketers to persuade people to do something by highlighting how many people are doing the opposite. Unfortunately, it’s usually counter-productive, so should never be used in fund marketing.

For example, governments often run negative social proof campaigns, by publicising low voting rates – in the hope that it will persuade people to turn out and vote in the next election. But studies show it doesn’t work because people often think ‘if everyone else is doing it, why shouldn’t I?’ And financial marketing often uses negative social proof by concentrating on the message that large numbers of people neglect to invest. But this could be counter-productive, as it gives potential investors little impetus to act. Instead, it may be wise to send out messages that focus on the large numbers of people that do invest in funds and, even better, in your particular fund.

If you want to find out how ProFundCom can help you use digital marketing to raise assets schedule a demo here

Find out how ProFundCom can help you

Sign up for a 3 month trial. We’ll help you get going and answer any questions.